Oct 272010

Photo (c) Whisky Antique

First posted 27 October, 2010 on Liquorature.

Excellent presentation; a rich, complex and smooth experience that reminds you why premium rums exist at all and makes for a good gift for aficionados

Somewhere in the midst of an alcoholic haze left by the last gathering of the Gentlemen of Liquorature, I had this vague memory of drinking quite a superlative little sipper.  Pat had, of course, been quite miffed when I wrote the review of the Bacardi 8, since he had wanted to surprise me with something I hadn’t had before  – but he got me on the rebound with this one. Fortunately, my tasting notes survive the bender, and once I sobered up and remembered my name, I dug them out for this review.

Angostura is that Trini distillery that now makes the excellent Zaya (Diageo, via its shareholding in Moet Hennessy, owns the Zaya brand, but do not own the distillery – CL Financial retains majority shareholdings there). They have been making blended rums since the early part of the 20th century (1947, according to them).  At that time Bacardi owned some 45% of the stock, which it held until 1997 when CL Financial – the largest T&T conglomerate with fingers in dozens of pies – bought the shares (they ran into a major liquidity crisis in 2008 and in order to get a bailout, relinquished seats on the board to the Government1).

I don’t as a general rule make a comment on the bottle, but in this case I’m happy to make an exception: Angostura, home of the bitters and the Royal Oak, have poured the 1919 variation into a short, squat, square bottle with rounded shoulder and a massive, voluptuous cork.  Its excellence is more in the simplicity than anything overt…I had the same feeling about the English Harbour 10 year old.

The 1919 is a blend of rums aged a minimum of 8 years – both bottle and the company website makes this claim – in charred oak barrels which were previously used to age bourbon whiskey.  It’s a golden brown liquid, quite clear, somewhat reminiscent of the Havana Club Barrel Proof and has that same brilliant hue when the sunlight hits it.

On the nose, there is surprisingly little spirit burn.  There’s a mellow billowing scent when the bottle is opened, in which the smooth odours of caramel, vanilla and flowers balance well and softly together. There is a richness to the nose that is quite unexpected, and it promises an excellent drink.  Sipping it is a uniformly pleasant experience: I don’t usually expect too much from younger rums, though those greater than seven years are usually pretty decent mixers (the Flor de Cana 7 yr old is a perfect example): this one, it must be said, is an exception.  As a ground level sipper, it’s bloody good, perhaps a slightly less sweet and less spiced-up version of the Captain Morgan Private Stock at about the same price, but equally smooth, equally tasty.

The feel in the mouth is warm and silky rather than harsh, and after letting it breath you get flavours of buttery caramel, vanilla and molasses, but not too much of any one: in fact, the 1919 is remarkably restrained and well balanced among these primaries.  Coiling subtly around this backbone are some fruity and softer floral hints that I can’t quite identify but that enhance the central notes excellently. The texture is slightly viscous and smooth as all get-out.  And the finish is long, warm and spicy, with the faintest hint of sharpness that seems to be there just to remind you this is not the best Angostura wants to give (that might be the 1824 rum).

All in all, for a rum that costs in the forty dollar range, I’m impressed. For all its relatively youth, it scores highly in all the right areas: presentation, nose, flavour profile, mouthfeel and finish.  It is equally good as a mixer or as a sipper, again very much like the Captain Morgan Private Stock. And what it lacks in the complexity and sheer brilliance of the older premium rums (like the English Harbour 25, Appleton 30 or the El Dorado 25 and 21), it makes up for by being, quite simply, one of the best low cost rums out there, one which the average Tom, Dick or Harrilall can afford, and enjoy.


Other Notes

  • In 2016 or shortly thereafter, the short, stubby and squared bottle (the “old” version, reviewed here in 2010) was replaced with a more standardized cylindrical barroom-style bottle; apparently the blend was tweaked as well, because a couple of commentators on Masters of Malt were scathing in their denunciations of the new taste.
  • Difford’s Guide and my own company biography of Fernandes Distillers both note that the “1919” name derived from a batch of rum recovered from a 1932 Government rum storage warehouse fire by Fernandes; some casks labelled 1919 survived and the rum inside was felt to be good enough to blend and bottle under that title.  As a result it became a standard blend ever after, even transferring over to Angostura when they took over Fernandes in 1973. However, that blend did change over time – for instance there was supposedly some Caroni in the original makeup, but certainly no longer.


  1. Wikipedia

  9 Responses to “Angostura “1919″ 8 year old Rum – Review”

  1. I was very happy with 1919 when I tried it for the first time while of vacation with my family in the US Virgin Islands. I typically drink scotch and occasionally have a glass of rum, finding that the sweetness of rum is sometimes overwhelming for me but not in this case. I thought the level of sweetness in 1919 was perfect for me and I have been drinking it ever since. To answer your question, I believe that the 1919 is referring to the year that this particular blend was first made. I do have a question for you now. Knowing I don’t particularly prefer a overly sweet rum do you have any suggestions for me? While sticking between a $40-$200 price range. Thanks, and very good review.

    • Hi Chris

      Any of the European bottlers would probably make a rum that you would like: Cadenhead, AD Rattray, Renegade…they tend to tone down the sweetness more than others.

      Appleton is always good (the 12 for sure). El Dorado 12 or 15, but these do edge a little towards the sugar you’re trying to avoid. You’d probably have to avoid soleras altogether. Havana Club Barrel Proof is excellent for its price, as is Pusser’s (the 15 yr old). Cuban rums generally suggest a profile you might enjoy, as do agricoles (like Karukera or Courcelles), though they are somewhat lighter and drier. You might also try some of the St Lucian rums like Admiral Rodney and its siblings.

      Have fun in your search


    • If you typically drink scotch then i highly suggest you start sipping some aged rhum agricole. Clement 6 year, Clement 10, and my favorite Rhum JM vsop.

  2. Hi Guys

    I’ve been looking for a decent upgrade from the typical supermarket mixer rums (Lambs Navy etc) and my googling led me here. I’ve just been reading elsewhere that the “1919” tag refers to the year of a terrible fire that virtually destroyed the original distillery.

    However, a few barrels of rum miraculously survived the inferno, and today’s Angostura 1919 is supposedly a recreation of the contents of those barrels.

    Thanks for the review, I shall save up for a bottle for Christmas..

  3. Just received a bottle of this ad a gift and I must say, that I was somewhat caught off guard.
    I found it intensely perfumed to a point where it was over the top. I had a lot of trouble getting anything but vanilla and flowery perfume from it. Will have to take a lot more time with it soon.

  4. This is a classic case of trying to hard to create a “smooth” sipping rum.

    It fails to deliver complexity as a sipper. The vanilla and perfumed notes are re-created in the companies “Liquid Sunshine” VAT19 which is a cheap gold mixing rum.

    • I still think it’s a decent low-cost sipping and/or mixing rum. As an entry into the world of better sipping quality rums, it’s a first step for those who don’t want to shell out a bundle, yet still get something better than table tipple. Henrik from Denmark (above) agrees with you, by the way.

      Not having tried the Liquid Sunshine Vat 19, I can’t respond to how well it compares.

      • Well we can’t all agree on everything that is part of the fun.

        I certainly don’t agree with Henrik’s assessment of Gosling’s Black Seal.

        Being a mixer doesn’t make a rum bad.

        All in my humble opinion of course

  5. A really nice rum to start the journey. I’ve had 2 bottles and it was a pleasant experience

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>