The Lone Caner is a sad island of rum appreciation in an otherwise obdurate ocean of whisky.
Being referred to as the ‘Caner is a wry commentary on the rabid whisky aficionados inhabiting the province, if not the country, in which I lived and the utter paucity of selections in the country I now call home; it found its origin in the Liquorature Collective, where I loudly and cheerfully bugled my preference for the extract of the cane right from the get go in 2009. After sampling, reviewing and writing about rums on and for Liquorature for almost four years, I decided to open up The Lone Caner as a website in its own right in March 2013.
I’m not a bartender, cocktail expert, mixologist, oenologist, or -ologist of any kind. I’m not an XP panelist, nor do I take part in judging, or contests (this may be pure laziness on my part). In fact, I just happen to like rums, reading about ’em, and writing . I’m in the fortunate position to have access to more rums than most.
The site is about rum reviews and tastings and essays on producers, as well as whatever news or issues of the rum world I feel like commenting on. Nothing more, though I have brought other areas of my interest into it here and there – the ‘Caner is, after all, a single person’s work. However, this site is primarily geared towards rums and their makers.
I have no particular interest in spiced or flavoured rums, never buy them and don’t review them – there’s too much good, unmessed-with stuff out there for me to bother. I’m not a 100% purist who believes every rum that has the slightest bit of adulteration is an abomination, but I don’t like the practice either (even though I’m aware it will always happen), and therefore am a firm proponent of honesty in labelling, so that the consumers can understand what they are buying.
Note that in an IPhone, Instagram and twitter age, I write for desktop sized screens. I’m not brief, and write what I feel – only 20-30% of my verbiage is ever about tasting notes, and throw in any observation that seems relevant. Where necessary, this includes as much information about the distillery or producing company as I can find in order to provide as complete a picture of the product as possible. Not everyone agrees with this idea (or my flowery language), but I’m done apologizing for that. It is what it is.
Also: people often say critics or reviewers should be neutral. I say “bulls**t.” I’m a firm believer in having preferences, but not biases. Reviewers are human beings with tastes of their own, and I’m no different. My preferences (not biases) exist, and where rum is concerned, full proof hooch bottled at greater than 40% will earn my favour. I have a thing for Demeraras, Jamaicans, Caronis from Trinidad, unaged pot-still white-lightning, agricoles and the occasional growly, off-the-reservation tipple only a mother would love. Not many Bajans enthuse me. I used to like sweeter rums, but over the years since 2009, the pendulum has swung somewhat the other way. That’s not to say I don’t like a Millonario or Zacapa 23 or a Diplomatico once in a while…I just don’t like them as much as I once did. My preferences change over time.
A few other points:
- I buy just about everything, and take no freebies except from my friends, who know of my passion, or the occasional formal tasting…I found that I simply didn’t believe in my own impartiality when agents and makers sent me samples, and so I deliberately eschewed the practice years back. I relax the rule if I have already written about and reviewed many products from a given company. I never solicit industry, but beg my friends a lot, and so am part of several sample sharing networks, coincidentally run by friends of mine (who are not in industry).
- I have a day job, studies, other interests, and a family. Sometimes that interferes with the frequency of updates. It happens.
- What you are getting is an educated, informed opinion – mine, to be exact. That opinion is influenced by the amount of rums I’ve tried, my background and my personal palate. My favouritism exists, and is developed and earned, not bestowed or bought. You are welcome to disagree, as long as you concede that my opinion may also have validity.
- Any errors of fact are entirely my own, made in all innocence during the course of my research. When pointed out, I’ll correct them.
- If you want to send an email, firstname.lastname@example.org will find me; or, drop a comment here on this page. I usually check in once or twice a day unless I’m on holiday somewhere.
All the best
“Ruminsky van Drunkenberg”